On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 01:11:48PM -0500, Andrew Ruder wrote: > The DM9000 was hard-coded to only support one DM9000 device. This patch > adds a new initialization function - dm9000_initialize_ex() - to support > registering multiple (and possibly dynamic) numbers of dm9000 devices. > This patch consists of: > > * Change the board_info struct to a private struct under eth_device. > * Add io address/data address/srom availability information to this > private struct. > * Replace all uses of DM9000_IO/DM9000_DATA with new members, ensure > that the eth_device struct propagates down to all helper functions. > * Make dm9000_initialize() call dm9000_initialize_ex() with filled > in information from the old preprocessor symbols (DM9000_IO, > DM9000_DATA, etc.)
So, on new platforms we call dm9000_initialize with the right IO/DATA locations for the given device, yes? I think I'd rather update everyone else to call things the right and new way, rather than work-around supporting both. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
