HI Hans, On 9 October 2014 02:13, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/09/2014 09:59 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 13:27 -0600, Simon Glass wrote: >> >>> Any more comments on this series please? I have a few nits so could >>> respin. >> >> I'm afraid I'm unlikely to get to look at this before the w/e. It looks >> like the majority of the series isn't actually about sunxi though? > > Right, could v2 please be split into a generic series and a sunxi series > on top of that, so that Ian and I can focus on reviewing the sunxi bits, > and the wider community can hopefully review the generic bits ?
Yes I can split it - there are an unusual number of additional patches as sunxi was the point at which I finally decided to change the uclass. > >> Without having looked at the specifics I can say I'm broadly in favour >> of moving towards Device Model / Device Tree. > > Ack. OK good. I think there will be benefits, even if they are thin on the ground with just these two drivers. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
