Hi Masahiro, On 2 October 2014 07:09, Masahiro Yamada <yamad...@jp.panasonic.com> wrote: > Hi. > > > > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:49:01 -0400 > Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 07:44:30AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On 25 September 2014 07:18, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: >> > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 04:38:09PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> > >> Hi Simon, >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:08:11 -0600 >> > >> Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > > +config OF_EMBED >> > >> > > + bool "Embedded DTB for DT control" >> > >> > > + help >> > >> > > + If this option is enabled, the device tree will be picked >> > >> > > up and >> > >> > > + built into the U-Boot image. >> > >> > >> > >> > Can you please add " This is suitable for debugging >> > >> > and development only and is not recommended for production devices." >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> Why is CONFIG_OF_EMBED not recommended for production devices? >> > > >> > > It's kind-of a question for the devicetree folks. The last time (a >> > > while back now) I asked for some general advice on how a DT should be >> > > shipped with hardware, being able to update the DT without replacing the >> > > whole of firmware was seen as a good thing. Combine this with that we >> > > should try (yes, we can't today due to incompatible bindings) share the >> > > DT between U-Boot and the kernel (or really, U-Boot and anything but >> > > again, last I checked the BSD bindings were very very different), >> > > embedding doesn't seem good. >> > >> > Addressing the binding differences, it's hard to see what these are >> > right now since the sorting and other churn in the Linux device tree >> > files. I think it would be good to sync the U-Boot files to the Linux >> > ones so we can see what bindings still differ. >> >> Yes, agreed. > > > Interesting. > > If so, "u-boot,dm-pre-reloc" is a bad idea, isn't it? > > It seems a really U-Boot-specific property, > although I only see it in test/dm/test.dts.
Yes it is U-Boot-specific, hence the prefix, but that is permitted. It is useful to avoid hacks I think, but let's see how it goes. Linux has its own properties also, also linux,stdout-path. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot