On Monday, September 15, 2014 at 03:07:11 AM, Chin Liang See wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Sun, 2014-09-14 at 12:46 -0400, ZY - trini wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:02:08AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > > > Hi Wolfgang, > > > > > > On 9/12/14, 5:51 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > > Dear Dinh, > > > > > > > In message <541373ad.4020...@opensource.altera.com> you wrote: > > > Also, I went back and look at the "flurry" of patches for socfpga, and > > > I must commend Tom Rini on a fantastic job for applying the patches. I > > > was only able to find 1 patch that needed addressing: > > > > > > [socfpga: generic board for socfpga] from Pavel Machek > > > > Can you test it, and Reviewed-by/Acked-by/Tested-by or something the > > patch? patchwork collects these and that is a big part of our review > > and merge process here. > > This is actually a big patch which should be split to smaller patch. > Nevertheless, I already started reviewing it last week and hopefully can > get it reviewed by today.
I did manage to split that big patch, clean it up and update it to match the latest rocketboards 2013.01.01 code. Please give me a few more days to finish with this and post the result. It's about 50 patches so far. I can send them to you off-list if you want to check them early. So far, the SPL cannot be built and I still depend on the one generated by Quartus. On the other hand , the rest of the U-Boot works well, incl. ethernet and SDMMC . I also fixed L1 and L2 cache issues all over the place and cleaned up the code, so the thing is also much faster now. > > > For now, I have it applied to > > > > > > git://git.rocketboards.org/u-boot-socfpga-next.git for_next branch. > > > > Here's a difference from the Linux kernel community. We really do want > > to use a git tree hosted on git.denx.de for pulls. > > > > > There are a few patches that needs to be addressed in the mailing list, > > > but I don't see any other patches that needs to be applied at this > > > moment. Please correct me if I'm wrong. > > > > > > To summarize, have we failed as maintainers of socfpga that you would > > > need to assign somebody else to be the custodian for socfpga? If > > > so, I apologize and would like for you to reconsider your position and > > > let us try to do a better job. > > > > Just like in the kernel community, it's a position that has to be > > earned. I understand there should be big round of patches posted soon, > > which will be a good place to see follow-through. There's also the > > denali NAND patches which are blocking another SoC from going in as well > > which I'm hoping to see v10 of posted sometime in the coming week. > > The v10 NAND patch was posted last week. In fact, the patch was working > for both Altera and Panasonic since v7. It takes up to v10 as I received > some late comments. > > At same time, just fyi, there is slowness for for last few patches as I > was on paternity leave for last few weeks :) No worries. Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
