On Thursday, September 11, 2014 at 09:46:18 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Michal, > > In message <54112b64.5010...@monstr.eu> you wrote: > > I am not sure if you need to have separate repo to work like this. > > I am keeping zynq patches in my microblaze repo and sending pull request > > to Albert > > (or Tom now) and there is no problem with that. > > Well, technically of course this works, but it is far from perfect. > It works only for those who actually know about this. But anybody > looking at the U-Boot site for any zynq related stuff will have hard > times to find it.
+1 , having separate u-boot-zynq would be a good idea. It doesn't "cost" much and greatly improves the organisation. > I think it is much better to make this knowledge public information - > and one easy way to do this is to have a separate repository for it, > which is listed on the custodians page, so everybody looking for it > will find all relevant information. > > > In socfpga case I think there are guys from Altera who maintain it. > > Well, they maintain the stuff at rocketboards.org ; there are efforts > on the way to mainline stuff, but the process is not exactly > satisfactory. I highly appreciate that Marek volunteers to put > efforts in this. > > As far as I am concerned, I support both Marek's and Masahiro's > requests. > > @ Marek and Masahiro: if we reach an agreement to create such repos, > please send me your SSH public keys that shall be used for > these. Also, what should the names be - u-boot-socfpga ? U-Boot-socfpga works OK I'd say -- it would cover all of Cyclone and Arria and Stratix socfpga families. Also, my SSH key should already be in position for u-boot-usb and u-boot-pxa ;-) Thank you! Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot