On Wednesday 27 May 2009 04:12:21 Stefan Roese wrote: > ACK. Even though I don't have a clue right now how this could be > accomplished in practise without breaking some of the (old) board ports.
i thought current practice was that if no one cared to update board ports and verify they still worked, then they were in effect dead and should be dropped. i'd also support initcall integration, but in order to have correct initialization order for core aspects, we're still going to need a hardcoded list somewhere -- this is how the kernel works too after all. hopefully this would allow us to unify the board init process into common code though. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
