Hi Minkyu, On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Minkyu Kang <mk7.k...@samsung.com> wrote: > On 04/08/14 20:39, Ajay kumar wrote: >> +Minkyu >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 30 July 2014 03:11, Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar...@samsung.com> wrote: >>>> Patchset V1: >>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg140596.html >>>> >>>> Patchset V2: >>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg141203.html >>>> >>>> Patchset V3: >>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2014-July/183096.html >>>> >>>> Changes from V1: >>>> [PATCH V2 3/10] : Don't mix cpu_is and proid_is as per Minkyu's suggestion. >>>> Also, incorporate Simon's suggestion of not using else. >>>> [PATCH V2 4/10] : For FIMD SYSMMU DT, use same compatible string as kernel. >>>> [TEST_ONLY V2 6/10]: Make this patch TEST_ONLY >>>> >>>> Changes from V2: >>>> [PATCH V3 5/9] : Use SPDX tags to define the license for the file: parade.c >>>> Removed TEST_ONLY patches. >>>> >>>> Changes from V3: >>>> [PATCH V4 1/9] : Fix comment style. >>>> [PATCH V4 3/9] : Use 'else if' clause instead of 'if'. >>> >>> Is this series ready to be merged? I have several series dependent on it. >> I have addressed all the comments from Minkyu. >> Hopefully, it should get in this time! >> >> Ajay >> > > Could you please rebase & resend this patch? I have sent "[PATCH V5 0/9] peach_pit: Add support for FIMD, DP and parade chip" after rebasing and testing.
Thanks, Ajay _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
