On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 09:04:09AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Steve, > > > > > > > On 14-08-26 02:14 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > Hi Steve, > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> On 14-08-25 07:57 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > >>> Hi Steve, > > >>> > > >>>> This series implements the "fastboot flash" command for eMMC > > >>>> devices. It supports both raw and sparse images. > > >>>> > > >>>> NOTES: > > >>>> - the support for the "fastboot flash" command is enabled with > > >>>> CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH > > >>>> - the support for eMMC is enabled with > > >>>> CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV > > >>>> - (future) the support for NAND would be enabled with > > >>>> CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH_NAND(???) > > >>>> > > >>>> This has been tested on ARMv7. > > >>>> > > >>>> ---- > > >>>> > > >>>> This series depends on: > > >>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/379438/ > > >>> > > >>> This patch is already applied. > > >> Correct > > >> (But it wasn't when I was preparing this....) > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/382443/ (to 382446) > > >>> > > >>> Could you resend the above patch series one more time? > > >>> > > >>> From the links it seems that in PATCH 1/4 you add > > >>> the ./common/aboot.c file and at PATCH 2/4 you remove it. > > >>> > > >>> Is this done on purpose? > > >> yes: done on purpose (in order to see the history of the changes to > > >> the file....) -- see the comments in the cover letter to that > > >> patch-series!!! > > > > > > Ok, Now it is clear. > > > > > > Is fair as I know bsd-3L-clause license is compatible with GPL. > > > > > > However, to be 100% sure I'd like to ask Tom (as he has much more > > > legal experience than me) to confirm that this code can be added to > > > u-boot. > > > > > OK -- note that this "bsd-3L-clause" clause is almost identical to > > the existing "bsd-3-clause".... > > Tom, could you give your opinion on this?
So, upstream made a slight (and likely unintentional) change to the normal BSD 3 clause license and changed the last clause from "the copyright holders" to "The Linux Foundation". I've poked our legal dept about this but I suspect the best answer is to go back up to Android folks and ask them to fix this quite likely unintentional change. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
