Hi Tom, On 25 August 2014 14:21, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:00:05PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> On 25 August 2014 12:54, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 09:58:21AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: >> > >> >> Buildman has been around for a little over a year and is used by a fair >> >> number of U-Boot developers. However quite a few people still use MAKEALL. >> >> >> >> Buildman was intended to replace MAKEALL, so perhaps now is a good time to >> >> start that process. >> >> >> >> The reasons to deprecate MAKEALL are: >> >> - We don't want to maintain two build systems >> >> - Buildman is typically faster >> >> - Buildman has a lot more features >> >> >> >> This series adds a few features to buildman to fill some gaps, adds some >> >> information into the README on how to migrate from MAKEALL, and adds a >> >> deprecation message to MAKEALL. >> > >> > I'm testing this out again in the Ubuntu 10.04 / LSF environment I have >> > access to but so far I'm still finding that test for --no-decorate isn't >> > working and I have to manually set it to False. >> >> Oh dear. I wrote a test for this in the second series. So if you apply >> that series, do the tests pass? It is in func_test.py and is called >> testGitSetup(). > > With my local kludge removed yes, all tests pass.
It's quite mysterious. I installed Ubuntu 10.04 and it runs python 2.6.5. The --no-decorate patch does work, although it does print an error. I could suppress that easily enough, just adding another arg 'capture_stderr=True' to the RunPipe() call in gitutil.py.Setup(). I see a problem with timedelta not having total_seconds. After that the threading dies. So I'm quite impressed you can get buildman to run at all. Are you using one of the later 10.04 releases? Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
