On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:00:05PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On 25 August 2014 12:54, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 09:58:21AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > >> Buildman has been around for a little over a year and is used by a fair > >> number of U-Boot developers. However quite a few people still use MAKEALL. > >> > >> Buildman was intended to replace MAKEALL, so perhaps now is a good time to > >> start that process. > >> > >> The reasons to deprecate MAKEALL are: > >> - We don't want to maintain two build systems > >> - Buildman is typically faster > >> - Buildman has a lot more features > >> > >> This series adds a few features to buildman to fill some gaps, adds some > >> information into the README on how to migrate from MAKEALL, and adds a > >> deprecation message to MAKEALL. > > > > I'm testing this out again in the Ubuntu 10.04 / LSF environment I have > > access to but so far I'm still finding that test for --no-decorate isn't > > working and I have to manually set it to False. > > Oh dear. I wrote a test for this in the second series. So if you apply > that series, do the tests pass? It is in func_test.py and is called > testGitSetup().
With my local kludge removed yes, all tests pass. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
