Ben Warren wrote:
> Daniel Mack wrote:
>> If the MAX address is given by the environment, write it back to the
>> hardware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <dan...@caiaq.de>
>> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.ha...@pengutronix.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/smc911x.c | 9 +++++++--
>> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/smc911x.c b/drivers/net/smc911x.c
>> index 30f2dc2..8c9a2a8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/smc911x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/smc911x.c
>> @@ -41,8 +41,13 @@ static int smx911x_handle_mac_address(bd_t *bd)
>> unsigned long addrh, addrl;
>> uchar m[6];
>>
>> - /* if the environment has a valid mac address then use it */
>> - if (!eth_getenv_enetaddr("ethaddr", m)) {
>> + if (eth_getenv_enetaddr("ethaddr", m)) {
>> + /* if the environment has a valid mac address then use it */
>> + addrl = m[0] | (m[1] << 8) | (m[2] << 16) | (m[3] << 24);
>> + addrh = m[4] | (m[5] << 8);
>> + smc911x_set_mac_csr(ADDRL, addrl);
>> + smc911x_set_mac_csr(ADDRH, addrh);
>> + } else {
>> /* if not, try to get one from the eeprom */
>> addrh = smc911x_get_mac_csr(ADDRH);
>> addrl = smc911x_get_mac_csr(ADDRL);
> Applied to net/next branch.
Could we get this asap into mainline? Sounds like an urgent bugfix to me:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/053079.html
Many thanks
Dirk
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
