On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 at 08:27:39 AM, Simon Glass wrote: [...] > > > > model. Instead, I'd love to see a mean to instantiate each *HCI > > > > controller and have a USB core which would track those instances. The > > > > USB core would then be able to call whatever generic ops on those > > > > instances as needed. Does that make sense please ? > > > > > > True, i understand your point here. I think the second approach i was > > > talking of, goes in this direction. > > > I think i could not put it well in words there. > > > > > > I will prepare an RFC patch for that, and post it as soon as its > > > ready, so that you can have > > > a look. > > > > Ah, this would be so very appreciated! Thank you! > > Should we consider just going straight for driver model?
I was thinking about that, but I'm worried it might break USB support on some platforms. Also, the size of U-Boot will grow on many platforms, right? What do you think ? Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
