Dear Jean-Christophe

> >  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > +struct gpmc_cs {
> > +   unsigned int config1;           /* 0x00 */
> > +   unsigned int config2;           /* 0x04 */
> > +   unsigned int config3;           /* 0x08 */
> > +   unsigned int config4;           /* 0x0C */
> > +   unsigned int config5;           /* 0x10 */
> > +   unsigned int config6;           /* 0x14 */
> > +   unsigned int config7;           /* 0x18 */
> why not an array so can use a loop as in enable_gpmc_cs_config()

i also thought about that. Config 1 to 7 are the names used by TI's
processor manuals, replacing by an array would lead to 0 - 6. If this
would only be used in enable_gpmc_cs_config that wouldn't bother much,
but as it is also used in evm/evm.h for example i think it will bring
more confusion than it helps to simplify the code.

best regards,
Matthias

-- 
Matthias Ludwig, Software Development
Ultratronik Entwicklungs GmbH, Gewerbestrasse 52, 82211 Herrsching, Germany
http://www.ultratronik.de  Tel: +49 8152 3709-356  Fax: +49 8152 5183
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB 55584
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to