Dear Fabio Estevam,

In message <1398746935-11855-1-git-send-email-feste...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com>
> 
> Currently we get the following failure when trying to build a uImage for 
> extensa:
> 
> $ ./tools/mkimage -A xtensa
...
> +     {       IH_ARCH_EXTENSA,        "extensa",      "EXTENSA",      },

Is this "xtensa" or "extensa"?

And which actual architecture would that be?  I cannot find any
architecture support for xtensa in U-Boot mainline, so why should we
add image support for it?

If you plan to add support for this architecture, then please submit
this patch as part of the series that adds such architecture support.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
Your own mileage may vary.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to