Hi Masahiro-san, On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 10:43 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > I wanted to show retionale why a make target "tools-only" is better > than "HOST_TOOLS_ONLY=yes".
Completely agree. I should have think a bit more before sending initial patch because right after the email was sent I thought why didn't I use a new target? :) New target looks much better than some random variable. It's shorter and easier to use. > > > > Doesn't work for me: > > ======== > > $ make tools-only > > HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep > > HOSTCC tools/aisimage.o > > HOSTCC tools/crc32.o > > HOSTCC tools/default_image.o > > HOSTCC tools/dumpimage.o > > In file included from include/version.h:11:0, > > from tools/dumpimage.c:11: > > include/timestamp.h:11:47: fatal error: > > generated/timestamp_autogenerated.h: No such file or directory > > #include "generated/timestamp_autogenerated.h" > > ^ > > compilation terminated. > > make[1]: *** [tools/dumpimage.o] Error 1 > > make: *** [tools-only] Error 2 > > ======== > > > > Oops - My bad. > I was disabling timestamp. > > > Could you fix like this? > > tools-only: scripts_basic $(version_h) $(timestamp_h) > $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=tools > Works as a charm for me as well. Do you mind to submit your changes (because it was you who implemented it properly and I don't want to "steal" your credits)? Or I do it still on your behalf putting you in as an author? -Alexey _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
