On 18 March 2014 14:17, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > Dear Andrew, > > In message > <capcvp5ekxdb_y16sym7x2cln67hbg4jt8jkos7n8+fsd8dr...@mail.gmail.com> you > wrote: >> >> However I would argue that using the 'silent' feature isn't the correct way >> to achieve it. If a user depends on having a console completely free then >> they probably shouldn't add a 'console=xyz' to their boot args in the first >> place. > > Even if it is "console=null" ?
If it is 'console=null' (which as you point out would be sensible), then the existing 'silent' feature will change that to 'console=' (which shouldn't ought to make a difference anyway). Where a user has 'console=null' in their bootargs, then my console would turn that into 'console=null loglevel=1' rather that the present which would be 'console='. Thanks, Andrew Murray _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
