On 12/03/14 21:27, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 at 01:21:15 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>>> On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 at 08:51:56 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>>>> Hi Simon, Marek,
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Marek,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10 March 2014 13:04, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
>>>>>> Squash these warnings in pinmux.c found with GCC 4.8:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c: In function
>>>>>> 'exynos_pinmux_config': /arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c:687:28:
>>>>>> warning: 'count' may be used uninitialized in this function
>>>>>> [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] for (i = start; i < start + count; i++)
>>>>>> { ^ /arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c:663:16: note: 'count'
>>>>>> was declared here int i, start, count;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c:687:28: warning: 'start'
>>>>>> may be used uninitialized in this function
>>>>>> [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] for (i = start; i < start + count; i++)
>>>>>> { ^ /arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c:663:9: note: 'start' was
>>>>>> declared here int i, start, count;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c:689:19: warning: 'bank' may
>>>>>> be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>>>>>> s5p_gpio_cfg_pin(bank, i, GPIO_FUNC(0x2)); ^
>>>>>> /arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c:662:24: note: 'bank' was
>>>>>> declared here struct s5p_gpio_bank *bank;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c: In function
>>>>>> 'exynos_pinmux_config': /arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c:687:28:
>>>>>> warning: 'count' may be used uninitialized in this function
>>>>>> [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] for (i = start; i < start + count; i++)
>>>>>> { ^ /arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c:663:16: note: 'count'
>>>>>> was declared here int i, start, count;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c:687:28: warning: 'start'
>>>>>> may be used uninitialized in this function
>>>>>> [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] for (i = start; i < start + count; i++)
>>>>>> { ^ /arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c:663:9: note: 'start' was
>>>>>> declared here int i, start, count;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c:689:19: warning: 'bank' may
>>>>>> be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>>>>>> s5p_gpio_cfg_pin(bank, i, GPIO_FUNC(0x2)); ^
>>>>>> /arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c:662:24: note: 'bank' was
>>>>>> declared here struct s5p_gpio_bank *bank;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that the warning is bogus, the function can never be called
>>>>>> with invalid 'peripheral' argument. GCC just cannot analyze
>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>
>>>>>> Cc: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.nav...@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Akshay Saraswat <aksha...@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Rajeshwari S Shinde <rajeshwar...@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
>>>>>> Cc: Minkyu Kang <mk7.k...@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Marek, great to get that annoyance fixed.
>>>>
>>>> Fix for this issue has been already posted :-) (one week ago)
>>>>
>>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/327065/
>>>>
>>>> But I don't mind if Marek's patch will be applied directly by Tom
>>>> before v2014.04 is released :-)
>>>
>>> Aren't you missing the exynos5_mmc_config() in your patch ?
>>
>> Yes, my work miss it. Lets apply your patch and be happy with "clean"
>> build results from gcc 4.8 :-).
>
> Roger that.
applied to u-boot-samsung.
Lukasz,
your patch will abandon because of this patch.
Thanks,
Minkyu Kang.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
