-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/28/2014 01:18 PM, Darwin Rambo wrote: > Given the ARM header below, is this code possible to put into > u-boot? > > For reference, I see this discussion below. > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-November/110884.html > > If this is not acceptable, presumably due to the "All rights > reserved" and "Redistribution in binary form..." clauses below, we > could try to find an alternative implementation that is GPL2.0+ > licensed or rewrite the parts we need from scratch. > > Any suggestions you have would be most welcome. Thanks.
So, that particular discussion was about fastboot, and in that particular case everything is OK, in the long run (I poked TI's lawyers about that). We're just missing a clean design version being ported and I know of a few groups / companies leaning on another entity to do so. But with your particular quoted header, I think we cannot use it as it puts restrictions on the binary redistribution as well. - -- Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTENovAAoJENk4IS6UOR1WuUYP/RukZAEnPLM4IEEIMpa9tAir J7FUa+zIJKerQfNQ+rrW5/sWGG2Zj/1A8twjcs7W8KXrbbaQEr+jpQRPspS3pa5q bmfeBDclNpuwqXtzeQvm6eNWVbkq0+4fJ25AI7fL1EuhpGFmcPfXoAW4DOFBJBUW B11BHzHO1PuWl+7fm5PLBT/kMjB8rv8gx6rhyNxp0f3/aN+U4GkSNvVBXo8cBOWm 4gO2dqWM299e3x2GYVKBbYwbAydBXXOjwpa3VoGljJPiz5iBT1DrMJV9R37kTRkj D07PUlV2aMNdZv+dNxV1FOce/bhcT8iRWyzUSlecPrNWDWp7nFaIaGBpDHh8iRKA thB7LlT1hQI88ksQH923CBaa2N1N/HgYtXYSiwRXx8bQexLIBieCvfUsHxqtWKRQ r+bf3febP0MYiU5BCHKHHpY3zfERGRIVmgAs/7khtm038ORAIxWLX7myvQyubfBz jRbwkZfpR1UXQ8g6zcbRah9mB12foVURF8a67v+9JC7p4/Jrrjb3ARgw8LwA61de kiqjUr3qDfEcow9KTxZPVFi5gLJXTSdMPzgrs/2cCJ2jFnN/olGd//eGaIZUzf6P 7L2oOEwv2i7p4FwwciTGhQWCfLO3YzU0MHnFJsHu+NaDdUxhpf/X/zwcAHvQqrc+ L6bmYpnta9ViVwJHzOSS =Si6y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
