Hello Marek,
Am 08.02.2014 15:09, schrieb Marek Vasut:
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 at 07:44:24 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
check if a fdt is correct signed
pass an optional addr value. Contains the addr of the key blob
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher<h...@denx.de>
Cc: Simon Glass<s...@chromium.org>
Should the FIT signature checking really be part of the 'fdt' command ?
Shouldn't 'bootm' check the signature (well, 'bootm prep' or such does) or
somesuch command ?
Why not? I use this "fdt check" command for example in a script, for
checking if the FIT image is correct signed, and if so, update with
the binaries in it some UBI Volumes (not only kernel, dt and/or
rootfs) ... but if this is not accepted, I can look into the bootm
command if I can use it ... but I do not want boot the FIT image ...
bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
