On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 at 08:45:52 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
[...]
> Current design:
>
> cmd_sf.c
This is just the one of the users of the SPI flash API, but not the only one.
> ------------
> spi_flash.h
> --------------
> sf (_probe, _ops), sf.c
> -------------------------------------------
> drivers/spi/ti_qspi.c (inform flash properties through "mode_bits"
> spi_slave {}
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> Proposed one (may be):
>
> Suppose If we have one more qspi controller(zynq) which is connected
> to serial nor
>
> cmd_sf.c
> -----------
> spi_flash.h
> ---------------
> SF-NOR
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------- drivers/spi/ti_qspi.c
> drivers/mtd/sf_nor/zynq_qspi.c
> (inform flash properties
> (inform flash properties
> through "mode_bits" of
> through "mode_bits" of
> spi_slave {})
> sf_nor_device {}
Did the formating here go awry ?
But anyway, your sf_probe.c/sf_ops.c/sf.c will only need to somehow discern
whether to call the regular SPI API or SPI-NOR API functions.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
