Dear Wolfgang, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Dirk, > > In message <49f5c746.6040...@googlemail.com> you wrote: >> Short status update after recent merges and patch updates. As usual, >> please correct if anything is wrong or missing. > > Thanks for the summary. > >> Dirk Behme wrote: >>> To avoid loosing the overview, here my list of pending OMAP3 patches >>> ready to be applied. From my point of view there are no open comments on >>> these which will prevent to apply them. But please correct if I >>> overlooked anything or add what (patches? comments?) I missed. >>> >>> 1. OMAP3: Beagle: Set pinmux conditionally for Rev C boards >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051013.html >> Mail >> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051459.html >> >> tells us that this should be applied to u-boot-arm next. But I can't >> find it in gitweb >> >> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next >> >> Did I miss something? > > I cannot find it either.
:( >> Btw.: As initial patch and first update was sent ~1 day after merge >> window close (Apr 4?) I hoped to have a chance to still get it into >> master ;( > > We don't have to bend much to consider this even a bug fix (it fixes a > specific board configuration, doesn't it?). Yes. We got a new board HW revision ('revision C', with some re-wiring) which needs some minor changes in PinMux to support this changed wiring. Thanks to a HW identification (resistors on GPIOs) we are able to auto detect HW revision and configure correct pin mux automagically. This is done by this patch. >>> 2. OMAP3: Remove legacy NAND defines >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050882.html >> Applied to u-boot-arm next. Request to move to master by Wolfgang. >> >>> 3. OMAP3: Fix timer handling to 1ms and CONFIG_SYS_HZ to 1000 >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051178.html >>> >>> 4. OMAP3: Fix changed mmc init command >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051179.html >> Applied to u-boot-arm master. >> >>> 5. OMAP3: Remove unused board-types >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051338.html >>> >>> 6. OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051339.html >> Patches 5 & 6 replaced by update which includes switch to checkboard >> and print_cpuinfo: >> >> OMAP3: Board specific updates (3 patches) >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051505.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051506.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051507.html >> >>> 7. Zoom2 respin II (10 patches) >> Note: Initial patch series for this was sent 'Wed Apr 1 18:08:38 CEST >> 2009' >> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050094.html >> >> IMHO this was while open merge window. >> >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050863.html >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050864.html >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050865.html >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050866.html >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050868.html >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050867.html >> Applied to u-boot-arm next (see comment about merge window above). >> >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050869.html >> Applied to u-boot-arm next (see comment about merge window above). >> >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050870.html >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050871.html >> Applied to u-boot-arm next. Request to move to master by Wolfgang. > > > I think all the patches listed above could and should go into master > now. > > Jean-Cristophe, what do you think? Do you have any specific reasons > for not pulling these into master now? > >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050872.html >> For the rest of the Zoom2 patches (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #8 & #10) >> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051383.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051384.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051385.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051386.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051455.html >> >> seem to apply. > > I'm not sure what you mean here, Dirk. I tried to say that for patches #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #8 & #10 there are comments in the 5 mails linked above (i.e. the comments in the 5 mails above apply to the patches #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #8 & #10). > I understand that > Jean-Cristophe requested changes, Yes. > and we're waiting for a resubmit, > right? Well, before waiting for a resubmit, I would wait for a comment (discussion?) from the patch author (Tom). Anyhow, seems we got a comment from Tom http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051605.html and _now_ we are waiting for a resubmit ;) > Jean-Cristophe, I really would like to see some progress in this > area, so I'd appreciate if you could apply the patches listed above > to master and send me a pull request. Thanks. Many thanks for helping and best regards Dirk _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot