On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 at 04:17:55 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 at 03:29:43 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> Both of these chips have 256kB big sectors, thus the _256K suffix, > >> compared to their _64K counterparts, which have 64kB sectors. Also, > >> they have four times less sectors than their _64K counterparts. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> > >> Cc: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <jaga...@xilinx.com> > >> --- > >> > >> drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 4 ++-- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> Note: Would be nice if someone actually tested this fix as I go by the > >> > >> datasheet and by the old code that _was_ in U-Boot before the > >> rework. > > > > btw. would be nice to get this one into current release to prevent it > > being broken. But I would _really_ appreciate some real-hardware testing > > here. > > Yes - I'll try it and let us know.
Thanks! Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
