Both of these chips have 256kB big sectors, thus the _256K suffix,
compared to their _64K counterparts, which have 64kB sectors. Also,
they have four times less sectors than their _64K counterparts.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>
Cc: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <jaga...@xilinx.com>
---
drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Note: Would be nice if someone actually tested this fix as I go by the
datasheet and by the old code that _was_ in U-Boot before the rework.
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
index daf8fe7..5f63023 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
@@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ const struct spi_flash_params spi_flash_params_table[] = {
{"S25FL032P", 0x010215, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL,
WR_QPP},
{"S25FL064P", 0x010216, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 128, RD_FULL,
WR_QPP},
{"S25FL128S_64K", 0x012018, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL,
WR_QPP},
- {"S25FL256S_256K", 0x010219, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 512, RD_FULL,
WR_QPP},
+ {"S25FL256S_256K", 0x010219, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 128, RD_FULL,
WR_QPP},
{"S25FL256S_64K", 0x010219, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 512, RD_FULL,
WR_QPP},
- {"S25FL512S_256K", 0x010220, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 1024, RD_FULL,
WR_QPP},
+ {"S25FL512S_256K", 0x010220, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL,
WR_QPP},
{"S25FL512S_64K", 0x010220, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 1024, RD_FULL,
WR_QPP},
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO /* STMICRO */
--
1.8.5.2
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
