Hi Pekon, 2013/12/10 Gupta, Pekon <pe...@ti.com>: > Hi Enric, > > Sorry I missed your earlier mail, so din't check this.. > >>From: Enric Balletbo Serra [mailto:eballe...@gmail.com] >>> >>> I saw that the OOB layout is not the same when I flash the rootfs from >>> the u-boot or from the kernel. For example: >>> >>> If the rootfs is flashed from the kernel the OOB data is like that: >>> >>> U-Boot # nand dump.oob 0x680000 >>> Page 00680000 dump: >>> OOB: >>> ff ff 79 43 68 64 3b 80 >>> b2 46 49 4d 58 2a 6d ff >>> 52 3f 7d 2a 7f a2 98 70 >>> 57 32 30 35 c7 ff ff ff >>> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >>> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >>> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >>> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >>> >>> If the rootfs is flashed for the u-boot the OOB data is like data: >>> >>> Page 00680000 dump: >>> OOB: >>> ff ff 79 43 68 64 3b 80 >>> b2 46 49 4d 58 2a 6d 52 >>> 3f 7d 2a 7f a2 98 70 57 >>> 32 30 35 c7 ff ff ff ff >>> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >>> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >>> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >>> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >>> >>> Note that look the same except after byte number 16. In the first case is >>> ff 52 3f 7d 2a 7f a2 98 70 >>> and in the second case is >>> 52 3f 7d 2a 7f a2 98 70 >>> >>> It's possible that something is wrong writting the OOB data ? Any clue >>> ? I'm in the right direction or completely wrong ? >>> > Yes, there seems to be an mis-match between u-boot and kernel > ecc-layout. Give me a day's time, and I'll try to root cause this. > However, don't have OMAP3 boards, so I can test this only on other boards. > > with regards, pekon
If I can help somehow just let me know. Thanks, Enric _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
