On Monday 20 April 2009 14:42:24 Scott Wood wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > no one said otherwise. please read the thread context before chiming in. > > if you had, you'd know that i was taking issue with the position of > > "let's not do XXX in v1 because it exists in v2", > > I don't recall anyone advocating that position, other than your original > inquiry ("i thought this was one of the points of u-boot-2?"). > > You seem to be arguing with yourself. :-)
most recently, it's come up with (previous) kconfig/kbuild and the clock changes. people (myself included) were hesitant to undertake big tasks by virtue of v2 already solving it. so yes, i am in effect invalidating my previous stances and in the process, attempting to elicit/vet other people's opinions. seems we're all up to speed now though. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot