On Monday 20 April 2009 11:39:52 Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:20:50AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> On Monday 20 April 2009 10:53:39 Robert Schwebel wrote: > >> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:42:08AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> > > > U-Boot-v2 is used here to do real work in our projects. If it > >> > > > isn't what you need, it is perfectly fine if you ignore it. > >> > > > >> > > my concern isnt really narrow to the Blackfin port. i was using it > >> > > as a practical example. we've talked about v2 in the past as the > >> > > answer to many of our problems and so we dont bother doing it in v1. > >> > > but that approach looks to be wrong as v2 is of little practical > >> > > importance. instead we should be doing what Jean-Christophe is > >> > > doing: poaching good ideas until we get to the point where v2 can > >> > > simply die. > >> > > >> > If you mean "you" while saying "we", then yes, it may be correct that > >> > this is your plan. "We" don't have any plans to let v2 die. > >> > > >> > Should we be mindful of the future? But not at the expense of the > >> > moment. Be mindful of the living Force, my young Padawan. > >> > >> i never said "kill it now"; quite the opposite really. in fact, it > >> looks like you really arent taking your own saying to heart. my point > >> is to look to the future and stop wasting resources. if v1 incorporates > >> all the features of v2, then v2 has no purpose at all except to split > >> development and waste peoples time. > > > > Well as you said at the moment there is not much community around > > u-boot-v2, so it's basically *our* time which we waste, and we are free > > to do so. At the moment it seems you're wasting *your* time by warming > > up this stupid discussion which Jerry already led to a nice ending. > > Indeed. Let this thread die. There is nothing wrong with v2 going > off and trying something new.
no one said otherwise. please read the thread context before chiming in. if you had, you'd know that i was taking issue with the position of "let's not do XXX in v1 because it exists in v2", not "wtf does v2 exist". -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
