On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 06:44:03PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On 19/08/2013 18:19, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:39:27PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: > > > >> (header for Freescale's i.MX processors) to allow the usage of > >> Freescale's tools to sign the u-boot image and provide a secure > >> boot. > >> > >> This has nothing to do with the Secure Boot extensions > >> implemented by Simon Glass, that can be in any case used to boot > >> later a secure image. Freescale's secure boot ensures that a > >> signed bootloader is started only if it is verified with a key > >> that is burned into the iMX fuses. Documentation about the > >> Freescale's secure process can be read from the AN4591, available > >> on the Freescale's Website. > > > > Where does Marek's patch fall in here exactly? > > Marek's patch is intended to add support for mxs based processor (mx23 > / mx28) and it is quite parallel to mine and I think Marek will > replace Freescale's own tool elftosb.
But, for clarity, there's not a whole bunch of common code that could be used here, and these i.MXes are different from those i.MXes? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
