On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:39:27PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: > (header for Freescale's i.MX processors) to allow the usage of > Freescale's tools to sign the u-boot image and provide a secure boot. > > This has nothing to do with the Secure Boot extensions implemented by > Simon Glass, that can be in any case used to boot later a secure image. > Freescale's secure boot ensures that a signed bootloader > is started only if it is verified with a key that is burned into the iMX > fuses. > Documentation about the Freescale's secure process can be read from the > AN4591, available on the Freescale's Website.
Where does Marek's patch fall in here exactly? Should he be based on top of yours, yours on his? It should all go via u-boot-imx, so you'll have to do the merging anyhow :) And on that note, things seem as sane as they're likley going to be, with the caveat of what you've already said you'll v3. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
