On 08/13/2013 10:32 PM, York Sun wrote: > On 07/26/2013 03:02 AM, Valentin Longchamp wrote: >> If this #define stays in config_mpc85xx.h, the P2041 based boards must >> define a lot of SRIO values even if they do not implement a SRIO device. >> >> The #define is moved into the P2041RDB board config file where it is >> used. >> >> Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longch...@keymile.com> >> >> --- >> include/configs/P2041RDB.h | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/include/configs/P2041RDB.h b/include/configs/P2041RDB.h >> index 4ea8717..523117b 100644 >> --- a/include/configs/P2041RDB.h >> +++ b/include/configs/P2041RDB.h >> @@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ unsigned long get_board_sys_clk(unsigned long dummy); >> * for slave u-boot IMAGE instored in master memory space, >> * PHYS must be aligned based on the SIZE >> */ >> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SRIO_PCIE_BOOT_MASTER >> #define CONFIG_SRIO_PCIE_BOOT_IMAGE_MEM_PHYS 0xfef080000ull >> #define CONFIG_SRIO_PCIE_BOOT_IMAGE_MEM_BUS1 0xfff80000ull >> #define CONFIG_SRIO_PCIE_BOOT_IMAGE_SIZE 0x80000 /* 512K */ > > I failed to see what problem this patch fixes. Maybe you were using an > older copy of u-boot? >
I developped all this with an earlier version of u-boot and I missed this one as I rebased. You are right, this is not needed and fixes nothing. Valentin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot