> On 08/06/13 13:40, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Mateusz Zalega, >> >> In message <1375786242-11734-1-git-send-email-m.zal...@samsung.com> you >> wrote: >>> Current implementation of do_dfu() and do_usb_mass_storage() requires >>> board-specific board_usb_init() which performs USB hardware initialization. >>> >>> I noticed that several boards have such a function defined, named either >>> usb_board_init() (which binds to ohci-hcd.c driver and had been used solely >>> by it) or board_usb_init() (as in ehci-omap.c). I _assumed_ that these >>> functions >>> do what's required by do_*() and renamed the earlier in order to unify the >>> naming >>> convention. >> >> I appreciate your efforts, but this whole area clearly falls into the >> domain of the device model rework. Is your suggested implementation >> in any way synchronized with what has been discussed about this topic >> before? > > I've caught up with driver model discussion. The changes I submitted are > related to sharing of board-specific hardware initialization functions > between drivers, therefore my patches, if I don't miss anything, do not > collide with driver model rework - these changes would have to be done > anyway.
If new USB driver model would use some other API to deal with board-specific functions, please correct me. I didn't manage to find related information, maybe I didn't look for it carefully enough. -- Mateusz Zalega Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Kernel and System Framework group _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
