On 08/06/13 13:40, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Mateusz Zalega, > > In message <1375786242-11734-1-git-send-email-m.zal...@samsung.com> you wrote: >> Current implementation of do_dfu() and do_usb_mass_storage() requires >> board-specific board_usb_init() which performs USB hardware initialization. >> >> I noticed that several boards have such a function defined, named either >> usb_board_init() (which binds to ohci-hcd.c driver and had been used solely >> by it) or board_usb_init() (as in ehci-omap.c). I _assumed_ that these >> functions >> do what's required by do_*() and renamed the earlier in order to unify the >> naming >> convention. > > I appreciate your efforts, but this whole area clearly falls into the > domain of the device model rework. Is your suggested implementation > in any way synchronized with what has been discussed about this topic > before?
Hello, I've caught up with driver model discussion. The changes I submitted are related to sharing of board-specific hardware initialization functions between drivers, therefore my patches, if I don't miss anything, do not collide with driver model rework - these changes would have to be done anyway. Regards, -- Mateusz Zalega Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Kernel and System Framework group _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
