On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 06:14:11PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:08:59 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD > <albert.u.b...@aribaud.net> wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:54:09 -0400, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > > > > > The new in the patch > > > board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds needed to be re-synced with > > > arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds again. > > > > Actually, I wonder why so many ARM .lds files need to exist at all, > > when arch/arm/cpu/u-boot[-spl].lds could be used most of the time. I > > suspect that the main reason for custom .lds files is ad hoc MEMORY > > declarations, which could easily be commonalized through adequate > > preprocessing. > > ... well here the only difference with arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds is the > addition of board/ti/am335x/libam335x.o right after start.o but this > should probably also be manageable in arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds.
Right. And this is a hard requirement (rather than "lets try and optimize around flash sectors for least waste) for NOR to work. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
