Hi Robert, On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Robert Nelson <robertcnel...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > I've tagged and pushed v2013.07-rc2. A bit more over the place than I > > should have gone, but picked up a lot of things that have been > > outstanding for a while. The big thing is a refactor of the boot loop. > > Everything should be working right now, but please test. Related to > > this is the ability to have crytpographically signed images. It's like > > secure boot in UEFI land, but hopefully without the kerfuffle. > > > > If you've got changes outstanding still, please start gently poking > > custodians with patchwork links. I've got a good bit of stuff I need to > > deal with myself still, but please prod me all the same. > > So, the bootm refactor ( 35fc84fa1ff51e15ecd3e464dac87eb105ffed30 ) > also broke bootz/zImage... > > Got it to atleast get past the "invalid OS" message via: > > diff --git a/common/cmd_bootm.c b/common/cmd_bootm.c > index 02a5013..a0b55ef 100644 > --- a/common/cmd_bootm.c > +++ b/common/cmd_bootm.c > @@ -1744,6 +1744,12 @@ static int bootz_start(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int > flag, int argc, > int ret; > void *zi_start, *zi_end; > > + memset(images, 0, sizeof(bootm_headers_t)); > + > + boot_start_lmb(images); > + > + images->os.os = IH_OS_LINUX; > + > ret = do_bootm_states(cmdtp, flag, argc, argv, BOOTM_STATE_START, > images, 1); > > However it's still locking up at "Starting Kernel ..." > What board is this please? I have only tested on x86, but perhaps have missed something here. Regards, Simon
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
