On 16:46 Fri 03 Apr , Detlef Vollmann wrote: > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> On 15:20 Fri 03 Apr , Eric BENARD wrote: >>> Detlef Vollmann a écrit : >>>> Where can I find that patch? >>>> >>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/56837 > Thanks. > >>> Is it interesting to loose time calculating PLL values at each boot when >>> these value can be defined in the board config file ? >> yes because you will not loose that much 1ms in the worse case >> but you will be sure about it evenif you change it in the at91bootstrap >> change >> or the lowlevel_init. It's safer > I probably agree. (Well, not completely, as I'd like to get rid > of at91bootstrap completely and let U-Boot be the original boot > code, but that's future.) I've a patch that I'll send tomorow that boot the at91sam9263ek from NOR without the AT91bootstrap > > Unfortunately that clock patch doesn't solve the timer issue, and > makes it even worse... > And I agree that it's not very useful to apply my old patch against > that. The point is that I don't know against which git repository > I should create any new patch. > I'd prefer to use git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git, but I'm willing to > use git://git.denx.de/u-boot-at91.git, but neither of those contain > the clock patch yet... I'll put in the clock branch
Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
