Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 15:20 Fri 03 Apr , Eric BENARD wrote: >> Detlef Vollmann a écrit : >>> Where can I find that patch? >>> >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/56837 Thanks.
>> Is it interesting to loose time calculating PLL values at each boot when >> these value can be defined in the board config file ? > yes because you will not loose that much 1ms in the worse case > but you will be sure about it evenif you change it in the at91bootstrap change > or the lowlevel_init. It's safer I probably agree. (Well, not completely, as I'd like to get rid of at91bootstrap completely and let U-Boot be the original boot code, but that's future.) Unfortunately that clock patch doesn't solve the timer issue, and makes it even worse... And I agree that it's not very useful to apply my old patch against that. The point is that I don't know against which git repository I should create any new patch. I'd prefer to use git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git, but I'm willing to use git://git.denx.de/u-boot-at91.git, but neither of those contain the clock patch yet... Best Regards, Detlef _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
