>> In message <20090331212514.ga19...@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> you wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 05:48:01PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>>> We still need some hint that the timer works in millisecond >>>> resolution, though - no matter what you call it. >>> How about just calling it HZ (or something more verbose like TIMER_HZ, >>> but the former makes it easier to share code with Linux) and declaring it >>> in a non-board header? >> It's OK with me. Other opinions? > > Obviously only like-minded people around.
I'm not particular ... and please don't mistake my sometimes dry sense of humor as complaining ... that's rarely my intent .... but please don't use a name that implies it is configurable. I learned the hard way that it is not. ;-) If the value truly represents clocks per tick, or milliseconds per tick, and the value is always fixed, something along those lines would certainly be appropriate. Best Regards, --Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
