On 06/17/2013 02:56:45 AM, Zhang Ying-B40530 wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Wood Scott-B07421
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2013 12:37 AM
To: Zhang Ying-B40530
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; u-boot@lists.denx.de; aflem...@gmail.com; Xie
Xiaobo-R63061
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/p1022ds: nand: introduce the TPL based
on the SPL
On 06/14/2013 05:08:49 AM, Zhang Ying-B40530 wrote:
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 5:50 AM
> To: Zhang Ying-B40530
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; u-boot@lists.denx.de; aflem...@gmail.com; Xie
> Xiaobo-R63061
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/p1022ds: nand: introduce the TPL based
> on the SPL
>
> Treat the autoconf.mk patch as a dependency. Don't try to hack
around
> its absence.
> [Zhang Ying]
> According to what you said, the same set of symbols will be declared
> under different ifdefs.
> That's the trouble, "The same set of symbols declared under
different
> ifdefs" will not be effective in the "Makefile", in the current
case.
It *will* be effective in the makefile if there is a separate
autoconf.mk for each phase. My point is that a separate autoconf.mk
for each phase is a requirement for TPL to be done in a sane way.
[Zhang Ying]
So, could you tell me where I do wrong? Please let me know the
specific.
Thanks.
Do not create a whole bunch of CONFIG_TPL_... definitions. Base your
patches on top of the patch that creates a separate autoconf.mk.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
