Hi Syed, On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Jagan Teki <jagannadh.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki > <jagannadha.sutradharudu-t...@xilinx.com> wrote: >> Use the exact names for W25Q 0x40XX ID's flash parts, as the same >> sizes of flashes comes with different ID's. so-that the distinguishes >> becomes easy with this change. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <jaga...@xilinx.com> >> --- >> Changes for v2: >> - none >> >> drivers/mtd/spi/winbond.c | 10 +++++----- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/winbond.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/winbond.c >> index 8457808..3c0ca88 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/winbond.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/winbond.c >> @@ -55,27 +55,27 @@ static const struct winbond_spi_flash_params >> winbond_spi_flash_table[] = { >> { >> .id = 0x4014, >> .nr_blocks = 16, >> - .name = "W25Q80BL", >> + .name = "W25Q80BL/W25Q80BV", >> }, >> { >> .id = 0x4015, >> .nr_blocks = 32, >> - .name = "W25Q16", >> + .name = "W25Q16CL/W25Q16DV", > > The id codes were same for these two parts, I think there is no way to > detect the separately. > Any idea?
Any comments on this. -- Thanks, Jagan. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot