Hi Syed,
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Jagan Teki <jagannadh.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki
> <jagannadha.sutradharudu-t...@xilinx.com> wrote:
>> Use the exact names for W25Q 0x40XX ID's flash parts, as the same
>> sizes of flashes comes with different ID's. so-that the distinguishes
>> becomes easy with this change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <jaga...@xilinx.com>
>> ---
>> Changes for v2:
>> - none
>>
>> drivers/mtd/spi/winbond.c | 10 +++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/winbond.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/winbond.c
>> index 8457808..3c0ca88 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/winbond.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/winbond.c
>> @@ -55,27 +55,27 @@ static const struct winbond_spi_flash_params
>> winbond_spi_flash_table[] = {
>> {
>> .id = 0x4014,
>> .nr_blocks = 16,
>> - .name = "W25Q80BL",
>> + .name = "W25Q80BL/W25Q80BV",
>> },
>> {
>> .id = 0x4015,
>> .nr_blocks = 32,
>> - .name = "W25Q16",
>> + .name = "W25Q16CL/W25Q16DV",
>
> The id codes were same for these two parts, I think there is no way to
> detect the separately.
> Any idea?
Any comments on this.
--
Thanks,
Jagan.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
