Tom, On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: >> Saw your reply but don't completely understand it. I think we'd still >> like U-Boot to populate the memory property if possible and it sounds >> like your patch would prevent that. One reason is that we'd like to >> be able to handle different memory configurations (one of which is >> 3.5G) with a single binary and have U-Boot just tell the kernel how >> much space there is. > > So, I've been assuming that these are different platforms that you > already append different device trees on, so that you use the same > binary still and just different DTs. Is that not the case here?
Current thought is that we'll even share a device tree between the two boards since differences between the two are very minimal. Sorta like how you can buy a Galaxy Nexus with 8G or 16G. They're the same device (as far as I know) just with a different eMMC part stuffed on. -Doug _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
