Hi Tom, On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:12:32 -0400, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:56:34AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 03/13/2013 09:35 AM, Beno??t Th??baudeau wrote: > > > Hi Stefano, > > > > > > On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:01:47 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > > >> On 08/03/2013 15:54, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > >>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> I think the giant list from Benoit got lost. It's a HUGE > > >>>> thing to change. I think we should just accept that config > > >>>> variables are mixed case, or at least not block this patch on > > >>>> a very large unrelated fixup. > > >>> > > >>> Agreed. Benoit's patch series contains 30 patches and it is at > > >>> version 9. > > >>> > > >>> It would be better to treat this fixup seperately. > > >>> > > >> > > >> Agree with you, this is my proposal to go on. I think we can also > > >> try to split patches for area of competence, with patchsets for > > >> i.MX, for ARM and for general. And maybe merging patches that are > > >> laready passed the review. > > >> > > >> For that, patches 1 until 9 are related to i.MX and mainly to the > > >> NAND for i.MX. They get already Scott's ACK. IMHO they are > > >> independent from the rest of the patchset and they can be merged > > >> now. My proposal is that I merge this part and for the next > > >> iteration the number of patches will be reduced ;-) > > >> > > >>> Currently mx31pdk is broken in mainline and Benoit's series > > >>> fixes it, so hopefully this can make into 2013.04. > > >> > > >> Let's see what we can do ;-) > > > > > > Yes, it could be split as you suggest, but it has already been > > > reviewed and tested by several people, so I'm not sure if we still > > > have to wait for anything before applying. Albert seemed to agree > > > for this v9 for the arm bits, but he has not given his formal ack > > > yet. Albert, is everything OK for you? > > > > > > The sooner it is applied, the longer people will have to test > > > before the release. > > > > I am not going to insist that the N different parts come in from N > > different trees, as long as the relevant acks are present (and it > > sounds like they are). I will give the whole series another read > > today just to be sure there's nothing popping out at me. > > I've given everything a read-over and nothing jumps out at me. I also > threw it (with a few imx things failing so I skipped) onto master and > built and booted my am335x_evm with it, so for the series: > > Tested-by: Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> > > And if Albert is happy, I'm happy to see it all come via u-boot-arm. As soon as ARM is back in sync with mainline, I'll start looking into pulling this in. Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
