On 13/03/2013 14:35, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: > Hi Stefano, > Hi Benoît,
>> For that, patches 1 until 9 are related to i.MX and mainly to the NAND >> for i.MX. They get already Scott's ACK. IMHO they are independent from >> the rest of the patchset and they can be merged now. My proposal is that >> I merge this part and for the next iteration the number of patches will >> be reduced ;-) >> >>> Currently mx31pdk is broken in mainline and Benoit's series fixes it, >>> so hopefully this can make into 2013.04. >> >> Let's see what we can do ;-) > > Yes, it could be split as you suggest, but it has already been reviewed and > tested by several people, so I'm not sure if we still have to wait for > anything > before applying. My proposal is only if we will not merge the whole patchset, making easier another iteration if required - but it seems it is not. > Albert seemed to agree for this v9 for the arm bits, but he has > not given his formal ack yet. Albert, is everything OK for you? > > The sooner it is applied, the longer people will have to test before the > release. I ask who should be in charge to merge the patchset - patches cover different areas (at least i.MX, ARM and general). In patchwork they are assigned to me - mainly due to the first part that is i.MX related. No problem for me to merge them if we get all required ACKs. Best regards, Stefano -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sba...@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
