Dear Simon Glass, In message <capnjgz2p6sbdxiwxw2tecdjadmhkn5inbgrpzbtvwmqutyv...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > Hi Tom, > > This series includes the sandbox map_sysmem() feature, and gets the > memory and hashing functions running on sandbox to allow testing/code > coverage. I have run it through buildman and it seems clean, with the > proviso that I don't have fully-working toolchains for all > architectures.
NAK. It is not correct to push changes that affect global code through a arch-specific custodian tree, especially if the submitter of the patche(es) is identical to the custodian of the very tree, and even more so if there have been not ANY independent Acked-by: or at least Tested-by: messages. This is NOT how the peer review process is supposed to work!! Especially as a custodian you must not do such things. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Pray to God, but keep rowing to shore. - Russian Proverb _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
