On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Otavio Salvador
> <ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>
>> I did it but mxs gives the impression it does mostly the same in both
>> socs; as the code is mostly different between both I choose soc so it
>> is clear it is for the soc it is being build.
>>
>> That was my thought... what do you think?
>
> When I read  "soc_ehci_hcd_enable_clock" I tend to think that this is
> a core USB function.
>
> When I read "mxs_ehci_hcd_enable_clock" it's clear to me that this
> relates only to mx23/mx28.
>
> Even if it handles the differences between mx23/mx28, I would prefer
> it with a "mxs" prefix.

Fine; I can prepare it for v4; I will wait for Marek's comments to try
to avoid a v5 ;-)

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to