On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Otavio Salvador > <ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > >> I did it but mxs gives the impression it does mostly the same in both >> socs; as the code is mostly different between both I choose soc so it >> is clear it is for the soc it is being build. >> >> That was my thought... what do you think? > > When I read "soc_ehci_hcd_enable_clock" I tend to think that this is > a core USB function. > > When I read "mxs_ehci_hcd_enable_clock" it's clear to me that this > relates only to mx23/mx28. > > Even if it handles the differences between mx23/mx28, I would prefer > it with a "mxs" prefix.
Fine; I can prepare it for v4; I will wait for Marek's comments to try to avoid a v5 ;-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
