On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> I did it but mxs gives the impression it does mostly the same in both > socs; as the code is mostly different between both I choose soc so it > is clear it is for the soc it is being build. > > That was my thought... what do you think? When I read "soc_ehci_hcd_enable_clock" I tend to think that this is a core USB function. When I read "mxs_ehci_hcd_enable_clock" it's clear to me that this relates only to mx23/mx28. Even if it handles the differences between mx23/mx28, I would prefer it with a "mxs" prefix. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
