Hi Tom, On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > [take 2 for me, gmail defaults to reply not reply-all] > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Simon Glass <s...@google.com> wrote: > >> Hi Tom, >> >> I see quite a lot of non-x86 patches in my todo list - does that mean >> that I should pick them up if I am happy with them, or just assign >> them back to you once I've taken a look? > > For stuff you've posted, yes, you can either toss it back to me, toss > it into a branch in u-boot-x86.git or toss it into a patchwork bundle > and hand 'em back to me.
OK will do. > >> I'm keen to get the sandbox fs and memory stuff in fairly early if >> possible, since I fear breakages and the longer people have to test >> the better. No one has screamed about map_sysmem() but I'm not sure if >> anyone noticed. So I could pull these in, build and send a pull if >> that suits? Perhaps one series at a time.... Also if Mike is having a >> break should I pull in the SPI ones assigned to me? > > In general I've tried to skim patches at least, and will give things > one more read over when it comes back at me to pull in (however that > is). For trivial SPI stuff (more IDs, etc) yes. For the changes to > writing and output and so forth, keep those in a > separate request if nothing else. OK, will try that. > >> There is also buildman, and I'm not sure what to do about that. It >> would be nice to have some feedback if people have tried it - I have >> had a few private emails only. I think it's a great help, but it still >> has some rough edges. > > I still need to try that myself, sorry. Has anything changed from the > last series you posted? Not really, it is in the same stage. > >> Anyway, please let me know your expectations with the above. Re x86, I >> am going to start applying things this week once the board removable >> patch is sorted out. >> >> Generic board is also a big change, but since it is sort-of parallel >> to existing code and only turned on on a board-by-board basis the risk >> is lower - it just need some weeks of review time IMO. > > Sounds good, thanks! > > -- > Tom Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
