On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 09:09:29PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote: > [take 2, sorry] > > Hi Tom, > > I see quite a lot of non-x86 patches in my todo list - does that mean > that I should pick them up if I am happy with them, or just assign > them back to you once I've taken a look? > > I'm keen to get the sandbox fs and memory stuff in fairly early if > possible, since I fear breakages and the longer people have to test > the better. No one has screamed about map_sysmem() but I'm not sure if > anyone noticed. So I could pull these in, build and send a pull if > that suits? Perhaps one series at a time.... Also if Mike is having a > break should I pull in the SPI ones assigned to me? > > There is also buildman, and I'm not sure what to do about that. It > would be nice to have some feedback if people have tried it - I have > had a few private emails only. I think it's a great help, but it still > has some rough edges.
Looking back at this, I think only buildman is left. Did all of the other patman related changes get submitted cleanly? I think the answer is we'll take in buildman now so it's easier to get folks to try it in their workflows and see where it takes us. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
