On 01/23/2013 04:01:49 PM, York Sun wrote:
On 01/23/2013 01:52 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 01/23/2013 03:46:04 PM, York Sun wrote:
>> On 01/23/2013 01:41 PM, York Sun wrote:
>> I should put RFC in the subject as I am not able to compile all
ARCH
>> myself.
>
> So how do you see this patch becoming non-RFC? I think most people
> don't have every single toolchain. You should at least get a
toolchain
> for a couple major architectures such as ARM. Usually RFC is for
when
> you know the patch has issues, and don't want it applied yet even if
> nobody else finds fault with it.
>
I know this version has problem. I am hoping more people get involved
and test what they can. I tried the arm toolchain you pointed to me. I
couldn't run MAKEALL for arm.
Even before your patch, using USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC? How many boards
failed?
-Scott
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
