On 01/23/2013 02:02 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 01/23/2013 04:01:49 PM, York Sun wrote: >> On 01/23/2013 01:52 PM, Scott Wood wrote: >> > On 01/23/2013 03:46:04 PM, York Sun wrote: >> >> On 01/23/2013 01:41 PM, York Sun wrote: >> >> I should put RFC in the subject as I am not able to compile all ARCH >> >> myself. >> > >> > So how do you see this patch becoming non-RFC? I think most people >> > don't have every single toolchain. You should at least get a toolchain >> > for a couple major architectures such as ARM. Usually RFC is for when >> > you know the patch has issues, and don't want it applied yet even if >> > nobody else finds fault with it. >> > >> >> I know this version has problem. I am hoping more people get involved >> and test what they can. I tried the arm toolchain you pointed to me. I >> couldn't run MAKEALL for arm. > > Even before your patch, using USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC? How many boards failed? > I don't know. Wolfgang brought it. Allen kindly offered help to verify on tegra which uses USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC.
York _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
