On 01/03/2013 06:49:05 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com>
wrote:
> On 12/26/2012 12:26:13 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
>> > Dear Otavio Salvador,
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>
wrote:
>> >> > Adjust the NAND partitioning layout so that there is a
separate
>> >> > partition
>> >> > for the ramdisk and fdt blob on the NAND.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>
>> >>
>> >> A partition for a ramdisk? maybe initramfs or initrd might be
better?
>> >
>> > Separate ramdisk (initrd).
>>
>> So maybe name it 'initrd' in the partition table?
>
>
> Why bias users against using initramfs instead?
I have nothing against initramfs or any other name, I just think
'ramdisk' is confusing (but it might be just my impression) that's why
I commented in the patch so others can comment on it too.
How is an abbreviation for "initial ramdisk" less confusing than
"ramdisk"?
-Scott
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
