Hi Scott,
> On 12/11/2012 01:56:25 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Hi Scott,
> >
> > > On 12/10/2012 09:24:32 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> > > > + sprintf(cmd_buf, "nand %s %p %llx %llx",
> > > > + op == DFU_OP_READ ? "read" : "write",
> > > > + buf, start, count);
> > > > +
> > > > + debug("%s: %s 0x%p\n", __func__, cmd_buf, cmd_buf);
> > > > + ret = run_command(cmd_buf, 0);
> > >
> > > Why not use the C interface to NAND?
> >
> > We also support there eMMC (both with raw and file systems).
> > Moreover we had this discussion some time ago (if we shall use
> > "command" or native C API).
>
> I don't see how "nand %s %p %llx %llx" supports anything that the
> NAND C API doesn't support.
>
> I can't follow every discussion that happens on this list, on the
> off chance it might eventually become relevant to NAND. "Some time
> ago" is not an easily followed reference to the archives.
I understand. Please consult following thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/134397
>
> -Scott
--
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
Samsung Poland R&D Center | Linux Platform Group
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
